
Face it. As product managers, we have a pretty poor set of tools. I don’t know you but I can guess what’s in your toolbox (coincidentally, Scott Gilbert posted a list of what’s in his toolbox yesterday):
- Microsoft Word or Google Docs
- Excel or Google Docs
- A bug tracker like Jira or Bugzilla
- A wiki like Confluence or Twiki
- Balsamiq or Axure or Omnigraffle for mockups
- Microsoft Project
- A to-do list manager – Trello or Asana or Outlook
- A mind mapping tool if you’re really advanced (I use Freemind)
I “get” to use a subset of that list as well. They are general purpose tools, all great in their own way, but nothing on that list has product management-specific functionality. (And woe be to you if you think Microsoft Project is a “product management tool.”)
Look around at your non-product manager colleagues. They are in much better shape. They all have tools that are built for them, that provide specific functionality for their jobs.
Sadly, that’s the PM tool situation for now (aside from all the new tools I’ve mentioned in a few previous posts). I hope the situation will improve.
But in the meantime, what do we? We take it up a level. We use tool-independent heuristics to help us be better product managers? Heuristics are:
- Simple
- Compelling
- Cognitively appealing
- Relatively easy to do
- Flexible enough that they are applicable to most situations
- Recognize that there is no right answer
- Don’t try to put you in a box or methodology
I’ve written about a number of these already including Cynefin, The Three Laws of Marketing Physics, and the Mission-critical Core/Context model (see yesterday’s post for a list).
These heuristics are great, but wouldn’t it be awesome if we actually had tool support for them? What if there were a product management tool that helped me work with my heuristics? What would that look like?
- Helping me find the right heuristic for the situation: There’s exploring the space (looking for a problem), creating and validating your solution (product planning, design, and execution), and creating and validating your value proposition (product marketing, positioning, selling). Different heuristics are useful at different points, some are useful throughout.
- Helping me organize my work with respect to the heuristic. For example, if I’m doing a Minimum Viable Product, the tool should insist I have a hypothesis I’m testing, and that I’ve designed the MVP to actually test that hypothesis.
- In some cases the heuristics involve doing research, such as “Get In The Van” and “Probe, Sense, Respond,” and the tool can help me collect the results and make sense of them.
- In other cases the heuristics involve me being creative, such as articulating a value proposition (that encompasses elements of the Three Laws of Marketing Physics). So the tool could guide me through this creative process, especially enabling productive collaboration with my colleagues and partners.
- Some heuristics help me structure information so it reveals useful patterns, such as the Mission-critical Core/Context model. The tool should provide the structure for me to fill in, and guidance on how to fill it in. It could even help me with analysis of the patterns and how I might take actions based on them.
A tool that did that stuff would be amazing. But I’m not done yet – there’s a lot more I need and expect. Stay tuned.

It's great to see someone taking a wide view of the product management world and the tools within. Really good to see you list out your ideal requirements. As mentioned on a previous post, I invite you to take a look at what we're doing at ProdPad – I think you'll find it actually answers more of these challenges you listed than you might think 😉
Janna – I'm just getting started! I've started conceptualizing a the outline of a review of several of the new tools that are out there, including ProdPad which is very promising.
For a view of what product people feel is needed in a tool, check out the voting on the ideas forum at http://ideas.reqqs.com/forums/131505-ideas-for-re….
Turns out help with prioritization rises to the top, right above communicating a roadmap. Here, I think people are asking for something like decision support heuristics.
Bruce – looking forward to reviewing the ideas on your forum! Thanks for the link.
Nils,
Do you think the lack of tools is due to a perceived small market? Or because the Product Management craft has been hard to pin down?
Dan
I believe it is a combination of several factors:
1) the problem is actually really difficult. As I discuss in several posts, the product management domain is complex, in the Cynefin sense. This means that the types of solutions that worked for simple and even complicated domains – simple being e.g., accounting/backoffice/ERP, and complicated being arguably CRM – will not work for product management. We’ve seen this over and over again in solutions that primarily focus on managing lists of requirements. Our requirements actually go through a complex lifecycle (not just complicated) where emergent behaviors are normal – and requirements management tools don’t really support those emergent behaviors.
2) the market is not that big, even though product management is the number one lever for most companies on increased revenue (for example, ERP *saves* money, but doesn’t make money, while CRM improves the effectiveness of selling existing products, it’s PM that gets new products and value propositions to market).
3) Finally, PMs are jacks of all trades by nature, and we’ve managed to make-do with other peoples’ tools. I think that has meant that we’re leaving a lot of value on the table, and with better tools we could be creating more value faster and getting it to market.
I hope that by recognizing point #1, and using new and modern development capabilities, we can create tools that are successful despite #2, and help deliver the value promised by #3.