<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wait, I know this one... &#187; design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nilsnet.com/tag/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nilsnet.com</link>
	<description>Good ideas, and how to turn good ideas into great products</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:00:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Catalyze &#8211; a community for product managers and business analysts</title>
		<link>http://nilsnet.com/2008/05/catalyze-a-community-for-product-managers-and-business-analysts/</link>
		<comments>http://nilsnet.com/2008/05/catalyze-a-community-for-product-managers-and-business-analysts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nilsnet.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catalyze is a community for people involved in requirements, business analysis, and user experience design - the people who are responsible for products being good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been spending some time the last few days reviewing the contents of the <a title="Catalyze Community website" href="http://www.mycatalyze.org" target="_blank">Catalyze community</a>. Tom Humbarger has done a great job of shepherding this social site for people involved in requirements, business analysis, and user experience design &#8211; the people who are responsible for products being <em>good. </em></p>
<p>There are a lot of good resources up there, including a number of active blogs, weekly live presentations (that are archived), forums, and many articles, such as these:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.mycatalyze.org/Default.aspx?FolderId=349&amp;FileId=3747&amp;TabId=871">Enhancing User Experience By Employing Collective Intelligence</a></strong></li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.mycatalyze.org/Default.aspx?FolderId=213&amp;FileId=3787&amp;TabId=871">Project Management and Business Analysis: Dependencies for Success</a></strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Tom himself has a <a title="Current Wisdom blog" href="http://http//www.mycatalyze.org/Blogs/CatalyzeBlogsCurrentWisdom/tabid/1006/Default.aspx">great blog</a> &#8211; latest article is on Twitter, which I ended up installing as a result (I&#8217;m nilsie).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nilsnet.com/2008/05/catalyze-a-community-for-product-managers-and-business-analysts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New article from Martin Cagan &#8211; Where Should Product Management Live?</title>
		<link>http://nilsnet.com/2006/07/new-article-from-martin-cagan-where-should-product-management-live/</link>
		<comments>http://nilsnet.com/2006/07/new-article-from-martin-cagan-where-should-product-management-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interaction design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mrd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nilsnet.com/blog/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his latest article, Where Should Product Management Live?, Martin Cagan makes the point that product management isn&#8217;t either a marketing function or an engineering function, but needs to be considered its own organization. This is a point that I suspect most PMs believe in their hearts, whatever organization they work in.
But I thought Martin&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his latest article, <a href="http://www.svproduct.com/index_files/blogdetail0706.htm">Where Should Product Management Live?</a>, Martin Cagan makes the point that product management isn&#8217;t either a marketing function or an engineering function, but needs to be considered its own organization. This is a point that I suspect most PMs believe in their hearts, whatever organization they work in.</p>
<p>But I thought Martin&#8217;s most interesting comment was the following, which ties into the Tyner Blain article I blogged on Monday about <a href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/23/interaction-design-and-structured-requirements/">tying requirements management and interaction design together</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The next most common situation is that product management is put in the engineering organization. While this has the benefit of putting the people that invent and design the product next to the people that build the product, this can also be problematic because engineering organizations are really designed to focus on building a product right, rather than building the right product.</p></blockquote>
<p>There seems to be a battle brewing on the design front. Do PMs do design or is that a job for the engineering organization? According to Alan Cooper, there are three key functions &#8211; 1) interaction design (which he does), 2) an engineering organization focused on finding technical solutions to design problems presented by the first group, and 3) another engineering organization focused on creating production code based on the technical solutions found by the second group. Setting aside this interesting bifurcation in the engineering organization itself, you&#8217;ll notice that product management doesn&#8217;t show up in Alan&#8217;s taxonomy. But if we make the logical mapping of PMs &lt;==&gt; interaction designers, it does align with Martin&#8217;s implicit assertion highlighted above &#8211; that PMs are responsible for design, as well as requirements.</p>
<p>We can then tie it back to Michael&#8217;s <a href="http://michael.hightechproductmanagement.com/2006/05/tips_for_writing_better_mrds.html">Ten Tips for Writing Better MRDs</a>, tip #2 of which is Use Screenshots, &#8220;Use screen shots or mockups to explain what you mean. Most of us have heard the saying &#8220;A picture is worth a thousand words&#8221;. <span class="dgraytext">When it comes to writing MRDs, a screen shot is worth a thousand words!&#8221;</span> But aren&#8217;t mockups what we PMs often get in trouble about &#8211; that it&#8217;s overstepping our purview into design? I&#8217;d be curious to hear what people think about this</p>
<p class="zoundry_bw_tags"><!-- Tag links generated by Zoundry Blog Writer. Do not manually edit. http://www.zoundry.com --><br />
<span class="ztags"><span class="ztagspace">Technorati</span> : <a class="ztag" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/product%20management"></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nilsnet.com/2006/07/new-article-from-martin-cagan-where-should-product-management-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
